IPP Mail Archive: IPP> RFC 3075/3076 - XMI Digital Signatures

IPP Mail Archive: IPP> RFC 3075/3076 - XMI Digital Signatures

IPP> RFC 3075/3076 - XMI Digital Signatures

From: McDonald, Ira (imcdonald@sharplabs.com)
Date: Thu Mar 29 2001 - 18:48:06 EST

  • Next message: Mark VanderWiele: "Re: UPD> Re: IPP> min/max custom size values"

    Hi folks,

    On a _slightly_ more serious note, for updated references in our
    IPP Printer Installation spec, see RFC 3075 (XML Digital Signatures)
    and RFC 3076 (Canonical XML 1.0). In order to reduce ambiguity and
    improve verification of XML digital signatures, canonicalization of
    XML should be used.

    Note that RFC 3075 introduces the concept of a 'Manifest' which
    allows a digital signature to be specified for a non-XML resource
    (like the gzip file of a print client).

    ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc3075.txt

    ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc3076.txt

    Cheers,
    - Ira McDonald, consulting architect at Sharp and Xerox
      High North Inc



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 29 2001 - 18:51:39 EST