IPP Mail Archive: Re: UPD> Re: IPP> min/max custom size v

IPP Mail Archive: Re: UPD> Re: IPP> min/max custom size v

Re: UPD> Re: IPP> min/max custom size values

From: Mark VanderWiele (markv@us.ibm.com)
Date: Fri Mar 30 2001 - 10:44:11 EST

  • Next message: Norbert Schade: "Re: IPP> RFC 3092 - Etymology of "foo" - 1 April 2001"

    Careful, we may be making the same mistake we made in IPP where the form
    size, media type, and tray are returned separately causing user interface
    nightmare since all three of these really must be selected together and
    represent the actual configuration of the printer. Therefore, I would
    propose that when we have settled in on a syntax for the form size, media
    type, and tray we go one step further and define a way to join the fields
    so that the proper constraints can be represented. Perhaps a simple "+"
    character. Again, form size by itself is meaningless.

    Regards,
    Mark VanderWiele
    IBM, Linux Tecnology Center
    512-838-4779, t/l 678-4779
    MARKV@IBMUS
    email: markv@us.ibm.com



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 30 2001 - 11:32:08 EST