IPP Mail Archive: Re: IPP> ippget Design Needs Work [use mul

IPP Mail Archive: Re: IPP> ippget Design Needs Work [use mul

Re: IPP> ippget Design Needs Work [use multi-part/related?]

From: Michael Sweet (mike@easysw.com)
Date: Fri Jul 20 2001 - 15:06:28 EDT

  • Next message: Manros, Carl-Uno B: "RE: IPP> ippget Design Needs Work [use multi-part/related?]"

    "Hastings, Tom N" wrote:
    > ...
    > Your idea of using multi-part/related with each part being an
    > application/ipp part. The first part is the initial response with all the
    > pending Event Notifications (and doesn't end with the
    > 'end-of-attributes-tag'). Each subsequent part is one or more additional
    > Event Notification Attributes Groups that have occurred as a "bunch" (and
    > doesn't end with the 'end-of-attributes-tag'). The last part will contain
    > one or more Event Notification Attributes Groups and an
    > 'end-of-attributes-tag' when there are no more events possible (all
    > Subscription objects in the scope of the Get-Notifications are gone or the
    > Printer wants to end wait mode and returns the "notify-get-interval"
    > attribute in a separate Event Notification Attributes Group).
    > ...

    I think that we need to make each part a valid/standard
    IPP message of its own:

        1. The application/ipp type defines an IPP "message" that
           can be a request or response. The format is identical
           save for a different interpretation of the operation
           or status code field.

        2. It will simplify client and server implementations -
           only 1 type of IPP data stream needs to be supported.

        3. It will allow the parts to be received in any order -
           not too important for the current HTTP transport, but
           might be important for other types of transports.

        4. It mirrors what the mailto and indp methods do - that
           is, one standard message format for each collection of
           events.

    I think the only issue is what the status code field will
    contain in the parts - should they all contain the same code,
    or should each IPP message contain the current server status
    (e.g. successful-ok-too-many-events)?

    -- 
    ______________________________________________________________________
    Michael Sweet, Easy Software Products                  mike@easysw.com
    Printing Software for UNIX                       http://www.easysw.com
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jul 20 2001 - 15:14:37 EDT