IPP Mail Archive: RE: IPP> NOT - IPPGET Delivery Method - IS

RE: IPP> NOT - IPPGET Delivery Method - ISSUE 02 'ippget' URI

From: McDonald, Ira (IMcDonald@crt.xerox.com)
Date: Wed Oct 24 2001 - 21:43:49 EDT

  • Next message: McDonald, Ira: "IPP> RE: IFX> NOT - IPPGET Delivery Method ISSUE 01: Event Wait Mode f or Job Cr eation operations"

    Hi Michael,

    Wait - the IETF _will not_ allow 'ippget:' (with nothing following or
    with nonsense that isn't a protocol target address following) as a
    URL scheme. It violates all the rules of URLs usage.

    The idea is that the EMPTY string (not the 'ippget' value) is
    unambiguous. BECAUSE it's empty there is NOT a protocol target for
    the IPP Printer object to send notifications to. The IPP client
    must retrieve the notifications in-band via IPP.

    OK?

    Cheers,
    - Ira McDonald

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Michael Sweet [mailto:mike@easysw.com]
    Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 10:13 AM
    To: Hastings, Tom N
    Cc: ipp (E-mail); IPP FAX DL (E-mail)
    Subject: Re: IPP> NOT - IPPGET Delivery Method - ISSUE 02 'ippget' URI

    "Hastings, Tom N" wrote:
    >
    > Or maybe it would be simpler just to include 'ippget' as if it were a URL
    > scheme in "notify-schemes-supported", but with the definition that when
    > using this "scheme", the URL in "notify-recipient-uri" is actually a
    > zero-length string.
    > ...

    Assuming that the IETF allows "ippget" as a scheme name, then
    allowing "ippget" as the only allowed notify-recipient-uri should
    also be OK (and perhaps less confusing than passing in a 0-length
    string which might trigger other parsing errors since some IPP
    implementations might validate URI values as valid URIs... :)

    -- 
    ______________________________________________________________________
    Michael Sweet, Easy Software Products                  mike@easysw.com
    Printing Software for UNIX                       http://www.easysw.com
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Oct 24 2001 - 21:45:13 EDT