IPP Mail Archive: RE: IPP> Print Quality Issue resolution

IPP Mail Archive: RE: IPP> Print Quality Issue resolution

RE: IPP> Print Quality Issue resolution

From: Harry Lewis (harryl@us.ibm.com)
Date: Fri Jul 11 2003 - 09:49:02 EDT

  • Next message: McDonald, Ira: "RE: IPP> Print Quality Issue resolution"

    My concern is that "save toner" is probably the most concrete concept
    compared to "Good, Better, Best" or "Text, Image, Graphics". The later has
    efficient application only in special cases (some of which may be very
    significant, like printing photo's). Otherwise, people stare at their
    mixed object document and wonder. I feel "save toner" should be explicit.

    We went from a flat set of descriptors to a pairing.. perhaps we should
    really go to a matrix (although I don't like the perceived complexity)

    Good - Better - Best
    Text - Text+Graphics - Graphics - Image
    TonerSaving

    ----------------------------------------------
    Harry Lewis
    Chairman - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group
    http://www.pwg.org
    IBM Printing Systems
    http://www.ibm.com/printers
    303-924-5337
    ----------------------------------------------

    "Zehler, Peter" <PZehler@crt.xerox.com>
    07/11/2003 04:54 AM

    To
    Harry Lewis/Boulder/IBM@IBMUS, "Zehler, Peter" <PZehler@crt.xerox.com>
    cc
    "IPP Discussion List (IPP@pwg.org)" <IPP@pwg.org>,
    printing-driver@freestandards.org, printing-jobticket@freestandards.org
    Subject
    RE: IPP> Print Quality Issue resolution

    Harry,
    We felt that there are many different attributes involved in heuristics
    for saving toner and printing fast. Some of those are "resolution",
    "media" and aspects of the document content. We felt the requirements
    were met by keeping the existing "print-quality" values and augmenting
    them with hints on how to process the document content to achieve 'draft'
    'normal' and 'high'. The assumption is that draft is fastest and uses the
    least toner.
    Pete
     
    Peter Zehler
    XEROX
    Xerox Innovation Group
    Email: PZehler@crt.xerox.com
    Voice: (585) 265-8755
    FAX: (585) 422-7961
    US Mail: Peter Zehler
            Xerox Corp.
            800 Phillips Rd.
            M/S 128-25E
            Webster NY, 14580-9701
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Harry Lewis [mailto:harryl@us.ibm.com]
    Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 11:26 PM
    To: Zehler, Peter
    Cc: IPP Discussion List (IPP@pwg.org); printing-driver@freestandards.org;
    printing-jobticket@freestandards.org
    Subject: Re: IPP> Print Quality Issue resolution
     

    > We finally agreed that the two values 'save-toner' and 'speed' are
    implied by the "print-quality". Since they were not required, they were
    removed.

    I think this warrants further examination. I have known toner saving
    methods that do a very good job of preserving print quality.
    ----------------------------------------------
    Harry Lewis
    Chairman - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group
    http://www.pwg.org
    IBM Printing Systems
    http://www.ibm.com/printers
    303-924-5337
    ----------------------------------------------

    "Zehler, Peter" <PZehler@crt.xerox.com>
    Sent by: owner-ipp@pwg.org
    07/10/2003 01:41 PM

    To
    "IPP Discussion List (IPP@pwg.org)" <IPP@pwg.org>,
    printing-jobticket@freestandards.org, printing-driver@freestandards.org
    cc
     
    Subject
    IPP> Print Quality Issue resolution
     

     
     

    All,
    During the PWG/FSG meeting in Portland we had a discussion about the IPP
    "print-quality" attribute and FSG's desire to add two new values,
    'economy' and 'fine', where 'economy' is lower than 'draft' and 'fine' is
    higher than 'high'. The FSG further proposed the addition of a new
    attribute, called "print-optimize", that would augment "print-quality"
    with values of 'image', 'photo', 'text', 'text-and-image', 'save-toner'
    and 'speed'.
    With regard to 'economy' and 'fine', we agreed that 'economy' would map to
    "print-quality"='draft' and 'fine' to "print-quality"='high'. There may
    be end user visible features that map to multiple attributes. We leave it
    to specific print domains to model these higher level aggregate features.
    When appropriate we will add needed elements to the Semantic Model.
    There was a lot of push back on "print-optimize". The main concern was
    that "print-optimize" contained a mixed bag of items. The two main
    categories were content metadata and rendering hints. We finally agreed
    that the two values 'save-toner' and 'speed' are implied by the
    "print-quality". Since they were not required, they were removed. The
    remaining values are needed to direct the type of optimization/processing
    that will be performed on the content. It does not necessarily mean the
    value describes the content. To clarify this we changed the attribute
    name to "print-content-optimize". Finally the value 'image' seemed the
    same as 'photo'. The name for this was changed to 'graphic'.
    As a result the following attribute will be added to the JobX
    specification in it next revision.
       print-content-optimize (type2 keyword)
          This attribute refines the value specified by the print-quality
          attribute.
          The standard keyword values are:
             'graphic': optimize for graphic clarity
             'photo': optimize for photo clarity
             'text': optimize for text clarity
             'text-and-graphic': optimize for both text and graphic clarity
     
    Peter Zehler
    XEROX
    Xerox Innovation Group
    Email: PZehler@crt.xerox.com
    Voice: (585) 265-8755
    FAX: (585) 422-7961
    US Mail: Peter Zehler
            Xerox Corp.
            800 Phillips Rd.
            M/S 128-25E
            Webster NY, 14580-9701



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jul 11 2003 - 09:53:18 EDT