From: Ron.Bergman@ricoh-usa.com
Date: Tue Apr 29 2008 - 14:52:31 EDT
There is no need to provide a 2.0, 2.1, 2.2 conformance. We have already
agreed on the conformance of the containing specifications.
See:
ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/ippv2-docs/ippv2-cups-proposal-2008-02-25.pdf
This effort is attempting to determine which operations within these
docments are to be mandatory.
"Ted Tronson"
<ttronson@novell.
com> To
Sent by: <msweet@apple.com>,
owner-ipp@pwg.org <blueroofmusic@gmail.com>
cc
<ipp@pwg.org>
04/28/2008 07:13 Subject
PM Re: IPP> Novell preferences on IPP
Operations
I guess I must have had an older version of the document that I filled out.
I didn't see that we were doing a 2.0,2.1,2.2 conformance. I will take
another look and try to make it match up with what you did. Also, the file
we posted was not .doc files - it was a .rtf (rich text format) and pdf.
I'll try to get this new matrix out here quickly. Thanks.
>>> Michael R Sweet <msweet@apple.com> 04/28/08 5:11 PM >>>
Ira McDonald wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Ted - I converted the file you just sent me to PDF and posted both
> on the PWG FTP site in the directory:
>
> ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/ippv2-docs/
>
> in the files:
>
> IPP-OPTIONAL-OPS-PRIORITY-NOVELL.pdf
> IPP-OPTIONAL-OPS-PRIORITY-NOVELL.rtf
>
> All - please send ALL your comments DIRECTLY to the IPP WG
> list to avoid lost information. An open standards process and a
> reliable mail archive are important.
If we are going to do the tiered 2.0/2.1/2.2 conformance levels, it
would be useful to see which level Novell is focused on...
BTW, I am unable to open the IPP-OPTIONAL-OPS-PRIORITY.doc file.
-- ______________________________________________________________________ Michael R Sweet Senior Printing System Engineer
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Apr 29 2008 - 14:52:49 EDT