If nothing else, you can take "shots" at my implementation and use this
table as a discussion point and/or benchmark for interoperability testing.
I know Alerts is a huge area that we want to get worked out.
I have removed all the values from LOC and put in "N/A", as these are
inherently printer unique. If it will help to see the LOCs, I can put
them back in.
In some cases, we will replicate one of the listed rows several times with
different LOCs. This is either due to greater granularity in our
instrumentation or diversity among our product implementations.
I hope this helps.
Harry Lewis - IBM Printing Systems