I fully support your position. Especially in this case where the changes
are required for another document, have been fully review by the group
developing the document, and were twice sent out for last call comments
with only 1 response which resulted in the second last call.
Let's just be done with it.
Ron Bergman
Dataproducts Corp.
On Thu, 2 Jul 1998 lpyoung@lexmark.com wrote:
> This is in response to Tom's question about whether the
> Printer MIB should follow the new PWG process. My simple
> answer is no. The Printer MIB is in a semi-dormant state
> waiting on the HR MIB to progress to IETF Draft Standard.
> I am willing to perform minor edits and corrections to the
> document as things come up. I do not see the value in sending
> the Printer MIB through a new process in its final stages.
> Regards,
> Lloyd
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> Lloyd Young Lexmark International, Inc.
> Senior Program Manager Dept. C08L/Bldg. 035-3
> Strategic Alliances 740 New Circle Road NW
> internet: lpyoung@lexmark.com Lexington, KY 40550
> Phone: (606) 232-5150 Fax: (606) 232-6740
>
>
>