PMP Mail Archive: RE: PMP> [Typo confusion] Updates for IANA

PMP Mail Archive: RE: PMP> [Typo confusion] Updates for IANA

RE: PMP> [Typo confusion] Updates for IANA Printer MIB

From: Wijnen, Bert (Bert) (bwijnen@lucent.com)
Date: Tue Jul 26 2005 - 14:17:12 EDT

  • Next message: Harry Lewis: "Re: PMP> RE: Need clarification on the definition of RFC 3805 'prtMarkerLifeCount' object"

    OK, then it makes sense.
    Sorry I misunderstood.

    Bert

    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: McDonald, Ira [mailto:imcdonald@sharplabs.com]
    > Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 19:09
    > To: 'Wijnen, Bert (Bert)'; McDonald, Ira; 'pmp@pwg.org'
    > Subject: RE: PMP> [Typo confusion] Updates for IANA Printer MIB
    >
    >
    > Hi Bert,
    >
    > Darn it - my typo. What it's supposed to say is:
    >
    >
    > (3) PrtAlertGroupTC - delete the erroneous comment
    > -- (2) is reserved for conformance information
    >
    > (4) PrtAlertGroupTC - add
    > unknown(2), -- Not in RFC 1759
    >
    > That is, we're only deleting an ASN.1 comment! Which
    > was added in RFC 3805 and was _wrong_ anyway - we don't
    > need to indicate that prtMIBConformance was the source
    > of an alert!
    >
    > Cheers,
    > - Ira
    >
    > Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
    > Blue Roof Music / High North Inc
    > PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839
    > phone: +1-906-494-2434
    > email: imcdonald@sharplabs.com
    >
    > > -----Original Message-----
    > > From: Wijnen, Bert (Bert) [mailto:bwijnen@lucent.com]
    > > Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 11:03 AM
    > > To: McDonald, Ira; 'pmp@pwg.org'
    > > Subject: RE: PMP> Updates for IANA Printer MIB
    > >
    > >
    > > Inline
    > >
    > > Ira suggests these changes:
    > > > ----------
    > > >
    > > > (1) PrtCoverStatusTC - add
    > > > unknown(2), -- Not in RFC 1759
    > > >
    > > > (2) PrtChannelTypeTC - add
    > > > unknown(2), -- Not in RFC 1759
    > > >
    > > > (3) PrtAlertGroupTC - delete
    > > >
    > >
    > > If we want to get rid of it, then we do NOT delete it.
    > > That may break existing use (possibly existing use by
    > > people we do not know).
    > >
    > > So the best way to get rid of it is to obsolete it.
    > >
    > > > (4) PrtAlertGroupTC - add
    > > > unknown(2), -- Not in RFC 1759
    > > > -- (2) is reserved for conformance information
    > > >
    > >
    > > Hope this helps and can be agreed to.
    > >
    > > Bert
    > >
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 26 2005 - 14:17:00 EDT