PWG Mail Archive: RE: PWG> Some Issues for the PWG Process document

RE: PWG> Some Issues for the PWG Process document

Roger K Debry (rdebry@us.ibm.com)
Tue, 19 May 1998 09:31:27 -0400

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Caruso, Angelo : "RE: PWG> Some Issues for the PWG Process document"
Previous message: Caruso, Angelo : "RE: PWG> Some Issues for the PWG Process document"

Tom,

I thought IETF requires voting by *individual* rather than *company* or=

*organization*. So counting individual votes would automatically put th=
e PWG
process in sync with IETF rules.

Thanks,
Ang

Ahh, but this is not the IETF. The PWG is really a consortium of prin=
ting
companies,
so counting company votes seems more appropriate.

Roger K deBry
Senior Technical Staff Member
Architecture and Technology
IBM Printing Systems
email: rdebry@us.ibm.com
phone: 1-303-924-4080

---
=

Next message: Caruso, Angelo : "RE: PWG> Some Issues for the PWG Process document"
Previous message: Caruso, Angelo : "RE: PWG> Some Issues for the PWG Process document"