PWG Mail Archive: RE: PWG> Some Issues for the PWG Process document

RE: PWG> Some Issues for the PWG Process document

Caruso, Angelo (Angelo.Caruso@usa.xerox.com)
Tue, 19 May 1998 08:03:01 PDT

Roger,

But if we ever want to push PWG work through the IETF standards track, it
sure would be easier if we followed their rules to begin with. Do you have a
specific objection to counting individual votes rather than companies?

Angelo

-----Original Message-----
From: Roger K Debry [mailto:rdebry@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 1998 9:31 AM
To: pwg@pwg.org
Subject: RE: PWG> Some Issues for the PWG Process document

Tom,

I thought IETF requires voting by *individual* rather than *company* or
*organization*. So counting individual votes would automatically put the PWG
process in sync with IETF rules.

Thanks,
Ang

Ahh, but this is not the IETF. The PWG is really a consortium of printing
companies,
so counting company votes seems more appropriate.

Roger K deBry
Senior Technical Staff Member
Architecture and Technology
IBM Printing Systems
email: rdebry@us.ibm.com
phone: 1-303-924-4080

---