PWG Mail Archive: PWG> RE: Character repertoires in printers

PWG> RE: Character repertoires in printers

From: BIGELOW,JIM (HP-Boise,ex1) (jim_bigelow@hp.com)
Date: Thu Oct 24 2002 - 19:15:07 EDT

  • Next message: don@lexmark.com: "PWG> Re: PWG-ANNOUNCE> Character repertoires in printers"

    Elliott,

    I agree that it's a good idea. I've been wondering how a sending
    application would know what fonts and characters are available in a printer.
    It also seems to me that a certain level of consistency would improve
    printing across a range of printers and promote acceptance of mobile
    printing by improving the user printing experience, i.e., the user prints a
    job to any printer and doesn't have the experience of a document printing on
    one printer and not on another.

    This also seems to me very important in Europe and Asian were there are lots
    of mobile users and characters outside the North American character set.

    A printer that conforms to the CSS Print Profile must support a minimum set
    of characters since the CSS2 specification says
    (http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/fonts.html#generic-font-families):

    "15.2.6 Generic font families
    [...}All five generic font families are defined to exist in all CSS
    implementations (they need not necessarily map to five distinct actual
    fonts). User agents should provide reasonable default choices for the
    generic font families, which express the characteristics of each family as
    well as possible within the limits allowed by the underlying technology. "

    I don't know if this defines a set of characters that is sufficient for
    printing world-wide. Perhaps, that is a question for the proposed group to
    answer.

    The W3C has had some interest in this topic and is doing some work for CSS3
    on fonts and web fonts. However, I think the PWG is the place to approach
    this from a printing point of view. However, I don't know if a new group
    should be chartered or the UPnP/XHTML-Print group asked to consider this.

    Jim Bigelow
    Hewlett-Packard

    -----Original Message-----
    From: ElliottBradshaw@oaktech.com [mailto:ElliottBradshaw@oaktech.com]
    Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 12:49 PM
    To: BIGELOW,JIM (HP-Boise,ex1)
    Subject: Character repertoires in printers

    Jim, could I get your two cents on this? Specifically I'd like to know if
    anyone at HP will take part. Otherwise I'll probably let it drop, as only a
    few people have responded.

    I still think it's a good idea...

      E.

    ------------------------------------------
    Elliott Bradshaw
    Director, Software Engineering
    Oak Technology Imaging Group
    781 638-7534

    ----- Forwarded by Elliott Bradshaw/oaktech/us on 10/24/2002 03:48 PM -----
     

                        Elliott

                        Bradshaw To: pwg-announce@pwg.org

                                             cc:

                        10/21/2002 Subject: Character repertoires
    in printers
                        01:00 PM

     

     

    Folks,

    As we discussed in Santa Fe, I am interested in the possibility of defining
    standard printer character repertoires for interoperability.

    For discussion, a draft charter of a hypothetical working group follows:

    <charter>
    In traditional printing environments, clients rely on font downloads when
    they are not sure a given character is embedded in the printer. As printing
    moves to small clients, downloading may not be an option and clients have a
    need to know what characters are available in a given device.

    The purpose of this group is to:
    1. Survey existing methods for indicating available characters, such as
    those used in the Bluetooth BPP 2. Define needs for printing character
    repertoires, considering such factors as country locations and wingding-type
    symbols 3. Using Unicode, select or define a list of useful repertoires for
    printing 4. Recommend a basic repertoire for inclusion in any printer that
    supports embedded Unicode-accessable characters 5. Propose an extension to
    the PWG Semantic Model for obtaining the character repertoires available in
    a printer 6. Work with UPnP and other groups to add repertoire support as
    needed </charter>

    Before proceeding, I would like any and all feedback on these questions:

    1. Is this a problem worth solving? (vs. vendor-specific solutions) 2.
    Should it be treated as part of XHTML-Print, UPnP, or some other group? (as
    opposed to a separate working group) 3. Who is interested in
    participarting, as author or reviewer?

    If there is sufficient interest I will prepare a more complete proposal.

      Thanks,
      Elliott

    ------------------------------------------
    Elliott Bradshaw
    Director, Software Engineering
    Oak Technology Imaging Group
    781 638-7534



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Oct 24 2002 - 19:15:14 EDT