PWG Mail Archive: Re: PWG> RE: PWG-ANNOUNCE> Rearranging

Re: PWG> RE: PWG-ANNOUNCE> Rearranging PWG schedule

From: thrasher@lexmark.com
Date: Wed Mar 26 2003 - 14:02:41 EST

  • Next message: Harry Lewis: "PWG> RE: PWG-ANNOUNCE> Rearranging PWG schedule"

    Since there are time constraints for the near term, can we just get the
    very next F2F meeting scheduled
    ASAP and look at further re-arrangements at that F2F...????

    For me...using keywords instead of numbers.......:)

    June 2-6 (preferable)
    June 16-20 (acceptable)

    Location options (no preference)... for either week.

    JT

    "Farrell, Lee" <Lee.Farrell@cda.canon.com>@pwg.org on 03/26/2003 01:54:34
    PM

    Sent by: owner-pwg@pwg.org

    To: "Harry Lewis" <harryl@us.ibm.com>, <pwg@pwg.org>
    cc:
    Subject: PWG> RE: PWG-ANNOUNCE> Rearranging PWG schedule

    Harry,

    What's the fundamental goal here? To revisit the schedule for all future
    meetings in the year, or just up to (but not including) October?

    Is there any reason not to try to "squeeze in" four [newly scheduled]
    meetings into the remainder of the year? [For example, June 2-6, August
    4-9, October 6-10 (why not still hold this in New York?), and December 1-5
    seem reasonable goals for future meetings. Eight week separation on
    average, but still allowing four face-to-face meetings for the rest of the
    year.

    Given that this organization has already cut down this year's schedule of
    meetings to only five, I would think that we should avoid reducing it to
    four if we can.

    Any thoughts?

    lee
    ===========================
    Lee Farrell
    Canon Development Americas
    110 Innovation Drive
    Irvine, CA 92612
    (949) 856-7163 - voice
    (949) 856-7510 - fax
    lee.farrell@cda.canon.com
    ===========================

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Harry Lewis [mailto:harryl@us.ibm.com]
    Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 10:29 AM
    To: pwg-announce@pwg.org
    Subject: PWG-ANNOUNCE> Rearranging PWG schedule

    To recover from cancelation of D.C. I've prepared a scheduling guide.
     <ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/general/misc/DCRecovery.pdf>
     ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/general/misc/DCRecovery.pdf

    As you can see, two weeks in June appear to be the best alternatives.
    Please identify any conflicts / alignments I have missed. We need to settle
    on the next meeting date quickly so people can reschedule their canceled
    flights. People flying AA seem to have the shortest amount of time and we
    may not be able to reschedule within their 2 day deadline! In this case I
    recommend these people reschedule for the Provo meeting in October.

    PLEASE HOLD DISCUSSION OF THIS TOPIC ON pwg@pwg.org NOT pwg-announce!

    ----------------------------------------------
    Harry Lewis
    Chairman - ISTO Printer Working Group
    IBM Printing Systems
    ----------------------------------------------
    (See attached file: C.htm)



    • text/html attachment: C.htm



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Mar 26 2003 - 14:26:44 EST