UPD Mail Archive: Re: UPD> PDL per UPDF

UPD Mail Archive: Re: UPD> PDL per UPDF


From: Jim Sommer (sommer@granitesystems.com)
Date: Mon Mar 26 2001 - 22:00:58 EST

  • Next message: don@lexmark.com: "Re: UPD> PDL per UPDF"

    I vote for one PDL per UPDF.


    At 3/26/01 12:17 PM, Norbert Schade wrote:
    >We never finally decided whether we will allow exactly one PDL per UPDF
    >description or more.
    >I put that on vote.
    >Please send your vote this week.
    >We will decide on Friday, March 30th, late afternoon.
    >My personal vote is one PDL only.
    >Don't move more information around than you need.
    >Editing of XML files is easier, when there are parrallel files (master
    >description, command sequences, locales, etc.) instead of editing
    >different sections in very different areas of one huge file.
    >Development is possible in steps done by different groups, while one huge
    >description probably never gets done.
    >Norbert Schade

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Mar 26 2001 - 22:01:57 EST