UPD Mail Archive: UPD> PDL per UPDF

UPD> PDL per UPDF

From: Norbert Schade (norbertschade@oaktech.com)
Date: Mon Mar 26 2001 - 12:17:06 EST

  • Next message: Jim Sommer: "Re: UPD> PDL per UPDF"

    We never finally decided whether we will allow exactly one PDL per UPDF description or more.
    I put that on vote.
    Please send your vote this week.
    We will decide on Friday, March 30th, late afternoon.

    My personal vote is one PDL only.
    Reasons:
    Don't move more information around than you need.
    Editing of XML files is easier, when there are parrallel files (master description, command sequences, locales, etc.) instead of editing different sections in very different areas of one huge file.
    Development is possible in steps done by different groups, while one huge description probably never gets done.

    Regards
    Norbert Schade



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Mar 26 2001 - 12:21:12 EST