I answered Alan a minute ago with the email below and sent him my current
version of the spec, which is slowly showing some sign of professional
I detached the doc file from this email, as I'm still working on it and
it's not yet in PDF format.
But it's good to notice that more people are getting to the heart of UPDF.
Makes those who devote parts of their life to it feel better.
Expect the next public version of the format this week.
----- Forwarded by Norbert Schade/oaktech/us on 08/12/2002 05:11 PM -----
To: "Alan Hlava" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
05:09 PM Subject: Re: UPD> Comments on UPDF specification(Document link: Norbert Schade)
welcome to the group.
There will be the day and time when I take a bit more time to talk to you,
but for nowE just a short answer you may be very interested in.
Thanks for your feedback.
As you can imagine, we know about the lacks.
But it simply needs time to do all this stuff.
Fortunately (as a matter of fact to a perfect time for you) I attach my
latest version of the specification documentation.
I leave it to you to play with it. You may enjoy it. this is the result of
the evenings of last week.
It's not yet converted to PDF, as I'm still working a bit on some sections.
I assume you have a WinWord somewhere in access.
After that it has to rest again, as we have to get back to the technical
Your last two items are known, but unchanged for now.
It will be fun to have somebody new to the group with serious interest.
we'll talk again.
<email@example.com To: firstname.lastname@example.org
Sent by: Subject: UPD> Comments on UPDF specification
The following are some comments about the UPDF specification
(Universal Printer Description Format, Version 0.83.1) document.
I am new to UPDF, but perhaps this is a positive thing in that it will
provide the perspective of someone coming to UPDF "cold" and
only having what's written down in the spec to go by.
* There is no table of contents and no index, making it impossible
to use this as a reference document.
* Heading levels are not numbered like they were in 0.81.3, making an
already difficult-to-follow nesting structure (see the following point) now
impossible-to-follow. There are not even page numbers in the current
* It is very difficult to discern the nesting of the XML elements. You
either flip back and find the list of sub-elements in the containing
(in 0.81.3 you could count the numbering level in the numeric header, which
gets very difficult as the nest level deepens). I would suggest using
heading numbers and indenting as well to make the nesting visually obvious.
* Many elements merely list the attributes without any explanation. While
the purpose of some can be deduced from the names, this is very
imprecise in a standards document and opens it up for misunderstandings
and incompatibilities between vendors.
* "XML-DTD encoding of UPDF" section references a DTD file but the UPDF
is actually defined via XML schema (XSD) files.
IBM Printing Systems Division
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 12 2002 - 17:18:11 EDT