IPP> Security proposal

IPP> Security proposal

IPP> Security proposal

Randy Turner rturner at sharplabs.com
Sun Nov 9 22:23:38 EST 1997


Bob Van Andel wrote:
> 
> Randy,
> 
> >
> > I'm wondering if we could define an *anonymous*
> > authentication that clients could use and that IPP
> > servers would recognize as a kind of *guest*
> > authentication...this may have already been
> > defined within some other security working group....
> >
> 
> Why is *anonymous* printing (which is certainly a desirable case)
> any different than *anonymous* Web site access?
> In other words, why isn't unsecured access acceptable for this case?


Logically, I think the two scenarios are the same. The problem with
this scenario is that HTTP and IPP have two different goals with
respect to the end user. Currently, I don't know of any way an HTTP
client has to direct an HTTP server to make a particular connection
secure, and IPP needs either end to indicate this requirement.


We're just using HTTP to transport IPP messages, IPP has different
end user scenarios...


Randy


> 
> Bob
> 
> Bob Van Andel
> Allegro Software Development Corporation
> 43 Waite Road
> Boxborough, MA  01719
> (978) 266-1375
> (978) 266-2839 fax
> 
> Read about the RomPager embedded web server toolkit at:
> www.allegrosoft.com



More information about the Ipp mailing list