IPP> MOD - URGENT: Ok to call 2nd printer uri: "printer-map-uri"?

IPP> MOD - URGENT: Ok to call 2nd printer uri: "printer-map-uri"?

IPP> MOD - URGENT: Ok to call 2nd printer uri: "printer-map-uri"?

Ron Bergman rbergma at dpc.com
Thu Dec 18 13:08:14 EST 1997


Tom,


I agree with the other responses that "map" is not a very descriptive (and
could be confusing) term.  I would vote for "printer-tls-uri"  but the
first ("printer-secure-uri") is still better than "printer-map-uri"


	Ron Bergman
	Dataproducts Corp.




On Wed, 17 Dec 1997, Tom Hastings wrote:


> In Washington and before, there has been discussion that calling
> the second uri, "printer-secure-uri" makes it sound like the first
> "printer-uri" is not secure.  So we've been searching for a better
> term.
> 
> Scott and Steve came up with the term (drum roll): 
> 
>    "Mutual Authentication and Privacy (MAP).
> 
> So ok to call the second uri Printer attribute: "printer-map-uri"?
> 
> It will be put right after the first uri: "printer-uri" secion
> 4.4.2 in the Model document.
> 
> SEND COMMENTS TO DL, SO WE CAN FORWARD THE INTERNET-DRAFT THIS WEEK
> TO THE IESG.
> 
> Thanks,
> Tom
> 
> 



More information about the Ipp mailing list