[IPP] Apple has reviewed the IPP FaxOut specification and has comments

[IPP] Apple has reviewed the IPP FaxOut specification and has comments

[IPP] Apple has reviewed the IPP FaxOut specification and has comments

Michael Sweet msweet at apple.com
Fri Jun 28 18:07:27 UTC 2013


Ira,

Short-lived or not, capturing those states (and eventually, fax-modem-ringing for FaxIn?) allows us to report events/traps that clients can use to present/update UI.


On 2013-06-28, at 1:19 PM, Ira McDonald <blueroofmusic at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Daniel,
> 
> Perhaps we should add "fax-modem-dialing" as a state reason (for the 
> Service and the FaxModem subunit) - but it's a very short-lived state
> to be capturing in printer-state-reasons.
> 
> It's similar to the original IPP/1.1 (RFC 2911) "connecting-to-device",
> but that one's only intended for passing a whole Job to the output-device,
> not just the Job data (i.e, the FaxOut document content).
> 
> BTW - I think we should NOT add "fax-modem-training", because it's
> a *very* short-lived state.
> 
> Mike - we'll have to register this (and any other) new Printer MIB Alerts
> w/ IANA for the Printer MIB TC (as well as in the IPP Registry).
> 
> Cheers,
> - Ira
> 
> 
> Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
> Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
> Secretary - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group
> Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG IPP WG
> Co-Chair - TCG Trusted Mobility Solutions WG
> Chair - TCG Embedded Systems Hardcopy SG
> IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB
> Blue Roof Music/High North Inc
> http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic
> http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc
> mailto:blueroofmusic at gmail.com
> Winter  579 Park Place  Saline, MI  48176  734-944-0094
> Summer  PO Box 221  Grand Marais, MI 49839  906-494-2434
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 8:58 PM, Manchala, Daniel <Daniel.Manchala at xerox.com> wrote:
> Mike,
> 
>  
> 
> Yes, one of the states we would like to have is ‘fax-out-modem-dialing’ or ‘fax-modem-dialing’.
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Daniel.
> 
>  
> 
> From: ipp-bounces at pwg.org [mailto:ipp-bounces at pwg.org] On Behalf Of Michael Sweet
> Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2013 5:12 AM
> To: ipp at pwg.org
> Subject: [IPP] Apple has reviewed the IPP FaxOut specification and has comments
> 
>  
> 
> Follow-up comments based on the feedback we have gotten so far:
> 
>  
> 
> Section 8.2 does not mention that the 'fax-modem-xxx' keywords are defined in PWG 5107.3.
> 
>  
> 
> Section 8.2 does not define the equivalent of the 'connecting-to-defice' value from "printer-state-reasons". Should we define keyword(s) to describe this and/or the following intermediate states: Dialing, Answered, Training, and Connected?
> 
>  
> 
> Section 12.2 should not re-register PWG 5107.3 keyword values for "job-state-reasons".
> 
>  
> 
> Section 13.1 is missing a reference to PWG 5107.3.
> 
>  
> 
> _________________________________________________________
> 
> Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair
> 
>  
> 
> 
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and 
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is 
> believed to be clean.
> 
> 
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and 
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is 
> believed to be clean.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ipp mailing list
> ipp at pwg.org
> https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp
> 
> 

_________________________________________________________
Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20130628/28ff69d7/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the ipp mailing list