[MFD] Re: [IPP] PWG Candidate Standards

[MFD] Re: [IPP] PWG Candidate Standards

[MFD] Re: [IPP] PWG Candidate Standards

Michael Sweet msweet at apple.com
Mon Oct 3 21:24:59 UTC 2011


Glen,

Thanks for the info; I've also noticed that recent published standards still have line numbers turned on. We should talk about this briefly at the F2F...

On Oct 3, 2011, at 2:13 PM, Petrie, Glen wrote:

> I have been doing some detailed work with some of the pwg candidate standards and, to date, I have noted the following.
>  
>  
> 5100.5 has an incorrect table of contents but ok in PDF.
> 5100.5 still has change information in the word doc
> 5100.5 Sec: 9.1.13 reference 5100.7 Sec: 4.2.4; there is no 5100.7 Sec: 4.2.4!
>             I  believe it should reference 5100.7 Sec: 3.2.5.3 document-source-os-name (name(40))
>             5100.7 states the OS name must be lowercase; however, the IANA
> registry (http://www.iana.org/assignments/operating-system-names/operating-system-names.xml)
> state the names must be uppercase.
>             ???? What is used by PWG ????
>  
> 5100.7 still has change information in the word doc
> 5100.7 Sec. 3.2.2 reference rfc2911 section 3.1.4.14; I believe the correction section is 13.1.4.14
>  
>  
> 
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and 
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is 
> believed to be clean. _______________________________________________
> ipp mailing list
> ipp at pwg.org
> https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp

________________________________________________________________________
Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair






-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/mfd/attachments/20111003/c3808e4c/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the mfd mailing list