Thanks for the info; I've also noticed that recent published standards still have line numbers turned on. We should talk about this briefly at the F2F...
On Oct 3, 2011, at 2:13 PM, Petrie, Glen wrote:
> I have been doing some detailed work with some of the pwg candidate standards and, to date, I have noted the following.
>>> 5100.5 has an incorrect table of contents but ok in PDF.
> 5100.5 still has change information in the word doc
> 5100.5 Sec: 9.1.13 reference 5100.7 Sec: 4.2.4; there is no 5100.7 Sec: 4.2.4!
> I believe it should reference 5100.7 Sec: 220.127.116.11 document-source-os-name (name(40))
> 5100.7 states the OS name must be lowercase; however, the IANA
> registry (http://www.iana.org/assignments/operating-system-names/operating-system-names.xml)
> state the names must be uppercase.
> ???? What is used by PWG ????
>> 5100.7 still has change information in the word doc
> 5100.7 Sec. 3.2.2 reference rfc2911 section 18.104.22.168; I believe the correction section is 22.214.171.124
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean. _______________________________________________
> ipp mailing list
>ipp at pwg.org>https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp
Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...