[MFD] Question on PageRanges attributes

[MFD] Question on PageRanges attributes

[MFD] Question on PageRanges attributes

Zehler, Peter Peter.Zehler at xerox.com
Mon Jan 30 18:34:05 UTC 2012


In representing the IPP model in XML I used a sequence for any set of
IPP attributes.  I realize that IPP attribute groups are often unordered
but in XML sequence simplifies extensibility.  Any time I encountered
multivalued attributes, attribute sets, or complex attributes I used an
XML sequence.  In the Semantic Model documents the convention I used was
that elements defined with using a sequence have a syntax of Complex.
As for why some are called collections and others are no that is
strictly an IPPism.  If IPP uses the name  "xxx-col"  based on IPP name
mappings I used "XxxCol" in the Semantic Model.

 

Is that answer acceptable?

 

 

Peter Zehler

Xerox Research Center Webster
Email: Peter.Zehler at Xerox.com
Voice: (585) 265-8755
FAX: (585) 265-7441
US Mail: Peter Zehler
Xerox Corp.
800 Phillips Rd.
M/S 128-25E
Webster NY, 14580-9701 

 

From: mfd-bounces at pwg.org [mailto:mfd-bounces at pwg.org] On Behalf Of
Petrie, Glen
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 12:30 PM
To: Petrie, Glen; mfd at pwg.org
Subject: RE: [MFD] Question on PageRanges attributes

 

Pete,

 

Why are some complex data type called collection and other are not?

 

glen

 

________________________________

From: mfd-bounces at pwg.org [mailto:mfd-bounces at pwg.org] On Behalf Of
Petrie, Glen
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 9:27 AM
To: mfd at pwg.org
Subject: [MFD] Question on PageRanges attributes

 

Pete,

 

For all other collection data-types, the attributes are specified.  For
PagesRanges,  LowerBound and UpperBound are not specified in Appendix A.
Should they be or is supposed to be understood they are integers?

 

glen


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and 
dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is

believed to be clean. 


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and 
dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is

believed to be clean. 


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/mfd/attachments/20120130/d7fe3211/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the mfd mailing list