Hi folks,
I agree with Harry. New registrations of channel types have
never been subject to rejection for 'lack of interest' in
the past. And it is the height of absurdity for the PWG
to have IPP/1.0 in published Experimental RFCs and IPP/1.1
not far behind as Proposed Std RFCs and REJECT their own
protocol for inclusion (as an OPTION) in the revised Printer
MIB.
Cheers,
- Ira McDonald (outside consultant at Xerox)
High North Inc