[SM3] SM2, 1.185: JobConstraintsSupported, JobResolversSupported

[SM3] SM2, 1.185: JobConstraintsSupported, JobResolversSupported

[SM3] SM2, 1.185: JobConstraintsSupported, JobResolversSupported

Ira McDonald blueroofmusic at gmail.com
Thu Jan 30 17:45:37 UTC 2014


Hi Norbert,

ALL of the services (including ScanServiceDescription) import and extend
the base ImagingServiceDescriptionType).

I think this is what you wanted?

Cheers,
- Ira


Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
Co-Chair - TCG Trusted Mobility Solutions WG
Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
Secretary - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group
Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG Internet Printing Protocol WG
IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB
Blue Roof Music / High North Inc
http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic
http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc
mailto: blueroofmusic at gmail.com
Winter  579 Park Place  Saline, MI  48176  734-944-0094
Summer  PO Box 221  Grand Marais, MI 49839  906-494-2434



On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Norbert Schade <
Norbert.Schade at conexant.com> wrote:

> Just for the high level view:
>
> I find JobConstraintsSupported and JobResolversSupported objects under
> PrintServiceDescription under PrintServiceBaseType under PrintService in
> the PrintService schema.
> As PrintServiceBaseType is also providing PrintServiceCapabilities, this
> is rather nicely tied up, meaning it can all be covered in one complex
> structure.
>
> When I search through the ScanService schema, I do find
> ScanServiceCapabilities and ScanServiceDescription objects.
> But the ...Description object is much shorter, especially not providing
> any reference to that constraints stuff.
> So to me it looks as if I'm supposed to create a somewhat independent xml
> instance based on the ServiceTypes schema that deals with constraints.
> Is that currently under review? Perhaps going to be merged into a common
> ...Description object?
> If yes, what is the intended schedule? Is that almost ready for a vote or
> still heavily edited these days? That would likely have an impact on which
> SM version we follow in our internal design.
> Regards
> Norbert
>
>
> Norbert Schade
> Systems Engineer (printing)
> Imaging Solutions
> Conexant Systems, Inc.
> 201 Jones Road
> Waltham, MA 02451
> U.S.A.
> Tel: 1-781-370-8929
> Email: norbert.schade at conexant.com<mailto:norbert.schade at conexant.com>
>
>
> Conexant E-mail Firewall (Conexant.Com) made the following annotations
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> ********************** Legal Disclaimer ****************************
>
> "This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole
> use of the intended recipient. Any unauthorized review, use or distribution
> by others is strictly prohibited. If you have received the message in
> error, please advise the sender by reply email and delete the message.
> Thank you."
>
> **********************************************************************
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> sm3 mailing list
> sm3 at pwg.org
> https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/sm3
>


More information about the sm3 mailing list