WIMS> Re: PWG-ANNOUNCE> FW: Pls review: draft-black-snmp-uri-06.txt

WIMS> Re: PWG-ANNOUNCE> FW: Pls review: draft-black-snmp-uri-06.txt

WIMS> Re: PWG-ANNOUNCE> FW: Pls review: draft-black-snmp-uri-06.txt

Harry Lewis harryl at us.ibm.com
Thu Aug 5 00:29:29 EDT 2004


Ira, in today's call you said we should use the SNMP URI for SourceURI in 
SendReport when the Proxy is dealing with an SNMP based managed entity. We 
used a simple example like snmp://ibm.com/myPrinter. Reading through the 
SNMP URI scheme draft it looks more like a SUBSTITUTE for WIMS (of course, 
not entirely). In the draft, the SNMP URI can designate a specific OID, 
range of OIDs, MIB walks etc! I'm not clear on the relationship between 
our use of the term ("SNMP URI" for the agent closest to the managed 
entity) and the definitions I'm reading in the draft! 
---------------------------------------------- 
Harry Lewis 
IBM STSM
Chairman - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group
http://www.pwg.org
IBM Printing Systems 
http://www.ibm.com/printers
303-924-5337
---------------------------------------------- 



"McDonald, Ira" <imcdonald at sharplabs.com> 
Sent by: owner-pwg-announce at pwg.org
07/29/2004 08:59 AM

To
"'pwg-announce at pwg.org'" <pwg-announce at pwg.org>
cc

Subject
PWG-ANNOUNCE> FW: Pls review: draft-black-snmp-uri-06.txt






Hi,

The SNMP URI scheme is soon to enter IETF last call.
Please take a look at it before 13 August and provide
feedback to the SNMPv3 list (see below) or send it to
me and I'll forward it.

Note that PWG WIMS depends on this URI scheme for
identifying legacy management agents.

Cheers,
- Ira

Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
Blue Roof Music / High North Inc
PO Box 221  Grand Marais, MI  49839
phone: +1-906-494-2434
email: imcdonald at sharplabs.com

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-snmpv3 at lists.tislabs.com
[mailto:owner-snmpv3 at lists.tislabs.com]On Behalf Of Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 4:34 PM
To: Snmpv3-wg (E-mail)
Subject: Pls review: draft-black-snmp-uri-06.txt


SNMP ethusiasts,

This document is in my queue to consider for publication
as a Proposed Standard. Before I do a 4-week IETF Last Call
I would like to get some feedback from SNMP developers/users.

Pls respond by August 13 at the latest.

Not sure if Keith and David are on this mailing list, so
if you have comments you want them to see, I prefer that
you copy them.

Thanks,
Bert 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.pwg.org/archives/wims/attachments/20040804/10583708/attachment-0001.html


More information about the Wims mailing list