WIMS> Re: CIM 15 Feb Concall at 2PM EST

WIMS> Re: CIM 15 Feb Concall at 2PM EST

WIMS> Re: CIM 15 Feb Concall at 2PM EST

Richard_Landau at Dell.com Richard_Landau at Dell.com
Thu Feb 15 13:20:36 EST 2007

Bill, I assume that I am to do the bulk of the two-hour working group
session, hence the number of slides.  Ira also has a couple slides on
the process of machine translation that should be interesting.  But
please feel free to steal any that would be useful to you for an intro
or in the plenary sessions.  


From: owner-wims at pwg.org [mailto:owner-wims at pwg.org] On Behalf Of
McDonald, Ira
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 21:05
To: 'wamwagner at comcast.net'; 'wims at pwg.org'
Subject: RE: WIMS> Re: CIM 15 Feb Concall at 2PM EST

Two more agenda topics:
2b. Review Rick's slides for WIMS-CIM Alignment session at:
4. Review Rick's latest revision of CR for CIM_PrintOutputTray at:
- Ira

Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
Blue Roof Music / High North Inc
PO Box 221  Grand Marais, MI  49839
phone: +1-906-494-2434
email: imcdonald at sharplabs.com 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-wims at pwg.org [mailto:owner-wims at pwg.org]On Behalf Of
wamwagner at comcast.net
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 6:26 PM
To: 'wims at pwg.org'
Subject: WIMS> Re: CIM 15 Feb Concall at 2PM EST

With Glen W. Petrie comments 

	-------------- Original message -------------- 
	From: wamwagner at comcast.net 
	The next CIM alignment  concall is at 2PM EST on Thursday, 15
February. Sorry I am so late with this announcement and that I have not
posted the minutes of the last call. I have been looking for my notes,
but evidently left them in Boulder.
	Dial In: 1-866-365-4406 
	Toll #: 1-303-248-9655 
	Passcode: 2635888# 
	1. Clarification of Ira-Rick communications.
	2. Review of presentation material for face to face. See
	Need to coordiate with Rick's presentation. Check on Milestones
	3. Discussion of Glen W. Petrie comments (attached) w/r to
Counter Spec.

	Bill Wagner
	Glen W. Petrie comments 


	Is "raw traffic" defined in the Semantic Model; otherwise, I
think it should be added to this document.

	I was really surprised at the definition of Image; image is a
very general term and here is represents something very, very specific.

	For Media Used does the term " media types" include both media
size and type;  i.e. there could several media that are the same type
but of differing size in a single job.

	For Monochrome impression I propose the first part of the
definition read as

	        " A Monochrome Impression is an Impression imposed using
[versus requiring] a single colorant..... 

	For Number-Up I suggest - The number of [remove: user Job]
logical pages to be imposed on each side of on a [remove: single media]


	I don't understand whe some of the definition define things as
objects.  For example does the Service need the words "An abstract
object the represents ...." or is a Service just "A software component
of a network...."   Same note applies to the definition of System - I
really don't think of a System as an abstract object as defined here; it
is just "A network host [computing] device.....".     In the text of the
standard, it does appear the Service and System are a "software
component" and "computing device" versus the abstract objects of them.  

	For Sheet I suggest - A [remove] Sheet is a single instance of a
medium. [remove rest of line]

	For Simplex - The printing of impressions on only one side of
each Sheet. [remove rest of line]

	Add Single-Sided - A synonym for Simplex.  [add this because
two-sided is included]

	For Waste - I don't believe that "non-productive ...." are the
right words; the words make it sound like something not necessary was
generated and printed by design.  I'm not sure what words to use... but
Waste Impression! s has g ood start.


	On page 19, second paragraph; first sentence; the word
"consumable" add clarification since all media would be consumable for


	In many of the table the units are in "1024 octets" and then
there is a unit is bracket called "koctets".  I had understood that "k"
was an old notation and was being.  Specifically, "k" means 1000 and
"Ki" means 1024.  So the units should be "KiOctets" following the
current notation of "KiB" (versus "kb")

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.17.39/687 - Release Date:
2/14/2007 4:17 PM

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.pwg.org/archives/wims/attachments/20070215/1b3d92dc/attachment.html

More information about the Wims mailing list