IPP Mail Archive: Re: IPP> Processing Algorithm

Re: IPP> Processing Algorithm

Scott Lawrence (lawrence@agranat.com)
Fri, 21 Nov 1997 10:55:47 -0500

>>>>> "JM" == Jay Martin <jkm@underscore.com> writes:

JM> If IPP allows multiple posts (requests) in which the client is
JM> expecting to receive multiple responses, then IPP should be
JM> clearly defined to do one (and only one) of the following:

JM> a) Ensure the order of responses is *exactly* in the same
JM> order as the requests, or

You don't have any other alternative if you are running over HTTP.

--
Scott Lawrence           EmWeb Embedded Server       <lawrence@agranat.com>
Agranat Systems, Inc.        Engineering            http://www.agranat.com/