P1394 Mail Archive: RE: P1394> Conference call Agenda

P1394 Mail Archive: RE: P1394> Conference call Agenda

RE: P1394> Conference call Agenda

Farrell, Lee (Lee_Farrell@cissc.canon.com)
Thu, 19 Mar 1998 10:21:44 -0800

Randy,

Last time our compromise was 4:00pm PST to accomodate the people from
Japan.

However, because of the time difference, some of them *might* not even
discover the e-mail that announces the teleconference before it starts
-- if we hold it today. (And tommorrow is Saturday for Tokyo.)

lee

> ----------
> From: Turner, Randy[SMTP:rturner@sharplabs.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 19, 1998 10:02 AM
> To: 'p1394@pwg.org'
> Subject: RE: P1394> Conference call Agenda
>
>
> Concerning the conference call...
>
> Someone needs to give me a time that is convenient for both U.S and
> Japan participants....
>
> What did we use last time?
>
> Randy
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg LeClair [SMTP:gregoryl@spider.epson.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 1998 6:13 PM
> To: 'Greg Shue'; Turner, Randy
> Cc: don@lexmark.com; p1394@pwg.org
> Subject: RE: P1394> Conference call Agenda
>
> Do we have a telecon scheduled?
> If not tomorrow(Thurs), then Friday or Monday.
>
> Idea for an Agenda
>
> Revised proposal summary
> - Alan Berkema tells me we'll have revision up by Monday 3/23
>
> Feedback received
> - How does it revise the model?
> - Is it a Unit Directory that provides a Function?
> - Is a Function is provided by one or more Services?
> - Individual Services are accessed via LUNs?
> - Glossary terms to consider adding to profile document
>
> Issues with revised model
> - Different LUNs represent different services
> - List of functions and required services
> - Do we know everything we need to access a function?
>
> Other issues?
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Greg LeClair
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg Shue [SMTP:gregs@sdd.hp.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 1998 11:46 AM
> To: Turner, Randy
> Cc: don@lexmark.com; p1394@pwg.org
> Subject: Re: P1394> Conference call proposal
>
>
> I agree that we need to call it. The time frames
> are OK for me, but 4PM EST is too early in Japan.
> (8 or 9 hrs before 1pm Pacific, i.e. 4-5 AM Japan!)
>
> Greg Shue
>
> >
> >
> > Uh, make that 4 PM EST. on 3/19 Is that ok?
> >
> > Randy
>
>
> --
> Greg Shue
> Hewlett-Packard Company
> Office Products Division gregs@sdd.hp.com
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>