From: Ron.Bergman@hitachi-ps.us
Date: Tue Nov 26 2002 - 18:31:37 EST
Harry,
My preference would be to move the date to July 21.
Ron Bergman
Hitachi Printing Solutions
-----Original Message-----
From: don@lexmark.com [mailto:don@lexmark.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 3:54 AM
To: Harry Lewis
Cc: pwg-announce@pwg.org
Subject: Re: PWG-ANNOUNCE> July conflict with IETF
My choices, in order of preference:
July 21
Leave as is (July 14)
June 16
**********************************************
Don Wright don@lexmark.com
Member, IEEE SA Standards Board
PatCom Chair, SCC Liaison
Member, IEEE-ISTO Board of Directors
f.wright@ieee.org / f.wright@computer.org
Director, Alliances & Standards
Lexmark International
740 New Circle Rd
Lexington, Ky 40550
859-825-4808 (phone) 603-963-8352 (fax)
**********************************************
"Harry Lewis" <harryl@us.ibm.com>@pwg.org on 11/25/2002 11:14:01 PM
Sent by: owner-pwg-announce@pwg.org
To: pwg-announce@pwg.org
cc:
Subject: PWG-ANNOUNCE> July conflict with IETF
It has been pointed out that our July 2003 meeting date (14-18) is the
same week as the IETF meeting in Vienna.
I would like to gauge the severity of this conflict to PWG members and
preferences should a our schedule need to be modified. If you have an
opinion please indicate
1. Prefer to keep current PWG July 14 -18 meeting date
2. Prefer to move PWG meeting to week of June 16
3. Prefer to move PWG meeting to week of July 21
I do not feel any other dates are viable due to the proximity of USA
Independence Day and the common practice of extending this holiday with
vacation.
No response will be considered a "don't care" NOT a "leave as is".
Please respond by Thursday Dec 12.
----------------------------------------------
Harry Lewis
IBM Printing Systems
----------------------------------------------
(See attached file: C.htm)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Apr 16 2009 - 10:55:40 EDT