PWG-IPP Mail Archive: RE: ADM - IPP Priorities

RE: ADM - IPP Priorities

From: Wagner,William (bwagner@digprod.com)
Date: Tue Jun 20 2000 - 12:55:55 EDT

  • Next message: harryl@us.ibm.com: "RE: ADM - IPP Priorities"

    I fully agree with Stuart. Qualdocs was not on the original list. I, for
    one, responded before Qualdocs was introduced. It is not clear who is
    considering qualdocs and who is not considering it. Finally, despite the
    appreciated explanations, I am still uncertain what position the PWG has
    with respect to qualdocs, which as far as I see, is still not a chartered
    IETF working group. If we are an unofficial advisory body to a non-existent
    working group, I think we must consider what our efforts would consist of
    before we consider priorities. If we have a real opportunity to help advance
    the idea of IPP for scanning/fax (by whatever name), I would put the
    importance just below a full featured client (which may be considered to
    include driver and font handling).

    William A. Wagner (Bill Wagner)
    Director of Technology
    Imaging Division
    NETsilicon, Inc.
    781-398-4588

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Stuart Rowley [mailto:Stuart.Rowley@ktd-kyocera.com]
    Sent: Monday, June 19, 2000 8:03 PM
    To: 'Manros, Carl-Uno B'
    Cc: pwg-ipp@pwg.org
    Subject: RE: ADM - IPP Priorities

    In under the wire...

    My rankings:

    7 Print Driver Download
    7 Open Source IPP Client
    3 Resource Object
    3 Set 2 Operations
    1 Production Printing Attributes
    0 Set 3 Operations
    0 Document & Page Exceptions

    Since Qualdocs was not included in the original vote request and many did
    not include it in their vote, I also omitted it. I suggest polling the
    participants at the next meeting to gauge interest in Qualdocs or redoing
    the email vote with Qualdocs as one of the defined candidates rather than as
    a write-in.

    Stuart
    Kyocera Technology Development



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jun 20 2000 - 13:03:16 EDT