From: don@lexmark.com
Date: Thu Sep 21 2006 - 08:18:43 EDT
Melinda, et al:
We are opposed to removing the "base level" from the CSS Print Profile. We
believe retaining the base level set of functions is necessary for the
ultra-low end products.
***************************************************************************
Don Wright don@lexmark.com
f.wright@ieee.org / f.wright@computer.org
Director of Standards
Lexmark International INCITS Executive Board Vice-Chair
C14/082-3 IEEE SA Standards Board Past Chair
740 New Circle Rd IEEE SASB Patent Committee Chair
Lexington, Ky 40550 Member: IEEE SA Board of Governors
859-825-4808 (phone) Member: IEEE CS SAB & W3C AC
603-963-8352 (fax) Director, IEEE-ISTO
***************************************************************************
"Grant, Melinda" <melinda.grant@hp.com>
Sent by: owner-xp@pwg.org
09/13/2006 09:24 PM
To: <xp@pwg.org>
cc:
Subject: XP> [CSS Print]
The CSS Print specification currently defines two levels of support: a
'base' level, and an 'enhanced' level.
So far as I know, only the enhanced level of support has been deployed in
the market. I'm wondering if there is any point in keeping the definition
of the base level. That is, it will be extra work and I question the
justification.
Does anyone feel it is important to maintain the base level of
functionality in future versions of the CSS Print specification? If not,
I plan to remove it in an upcoming release.
Please raise any objections or express support by responding here or on www-style@w3.org by September 23.
Best wishes,
Melinda
_____
HP - Melinda Grant
Connectivity Standards
Consumer Printing and Imaging
+1 (541) 582-3681
melinda.grant@hp.com
_____
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Sep 21 2006 - 08:19:33 EDT