[Cloud] May Face-to-Face Slide drafts

[Michael Sweet]

Randy,

I believe the resistance to a normative REST implementation was due to the issues common in interoperability between REST implementations (no schema that defines them, they are "informal"...)


On May 10, 2013, at 9:33 AM, Randy Turner <rturner at amalfisystems.com> wrote:
> 
> I guess I overlooked this in my previous review of this document, but the charter uses the phrase "informative REST" -- It would have been nice to make the REST mapping the primary, and the soap binding secondary, as I believe this would make implementation and proliferation of our cloud imaging solution more likely.
> 
> Randy
> 
> 
> On May 10, 2013, at 8:59 AM, "William A Wagner" <wamwagner at comcast.net> wrote:
> 
>> The PWG  Steering Committee has approved the revised Cloud WG Charter, which is now posted at:
>> ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/cloud/charter/ch-cloud-charter-20130510.pdf.
>>  
>> The Plenary and Session slides for the May 14 and May 15 meetings have been updated and  are posted at :
>>  
>> ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/cloud/slides/Cloud-WG-Plenary-May-2013.pdf
>> ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/cloud/slides/Cloud-WG-Plenary-May-2013.pptx
>>  
>> ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/cloud/slides/Cloud-WG-Meeting-May-2013.pdf
>> ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/cloud/slides/Cloud-WG-Meeting-May-2013.pptx
>>  
>>  
>> Thanks,
>>  
>> Bill Wagner
>> 
>> -- 
>> This message has been scanned for viruses and 
>> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is 
>> believed to be clean. _______________________________________________
>> cloud mailing list
>> cloud at pwg.org
>> https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
> 
> 
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and 
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is 
> believed to be clean.
> _______________________________________________
> cloud mailing list
> cloud at pwg.org
> https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud

_________________________________________________________
Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/cloud/attachments/20130510/c48122a5/attachment-0002.html>