I'm need to brush up on my Venn diagrams :-)
Seriously, I think that the work of the TCG HCWG will necessarily be
TCG-specific.
--
Regards,
Brian Smithson
PM, Security Research
PMP, CISSP, CISA, ISO 27000 PA
Advanced Imaging and Network Technologies
Ricoh Americas Corporation
(408)346-4435
Randy Turner wrote:
> Hi All,
>> After reading the minutes from the latest TCG HCWG re-chartering
> discussion, I have the following comment...
>> I think, at a minimum, any new charter for the TCG HCWG should be
> filtered through the goals and objectives of the p2600 work
> and the PWG-IDS activity to determine any new objectives.
>> in other words,
>> o1 = set of p2600 goals and objectives (both core standard and
> protection profiles)
> o2 = set of PWG IDS goals and objectives (including NEA/TNC + IDS
> attributes)
> o3 = The union of o1 and o2 (i.e., o1 U o2)
>> o4 = The set of proposed TCG HCWG goals and objectives
>> The intersection of o3 and o4 should be the empty set
>> Thanks,
> Randy
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brian Smithson"
> <brian.smithson at RICOH-USA.COM>
> To: <STDS-2600 at LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
> Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 1:13 PM
> Subject: [2600] minutes from April 8 2009 TCG HCWG charter discussion
> teleconference
>>>> Please see the attached meeting minutes from yesterday's teleconference
>> discussion of the TCG Hardcopy Workgroup charter revision.
>>>> Many thanks to Shah Bhatti for leading the discussion, Seigo Kotani for
>> acting as interim chair and BoD liaison, Steve Hanna for providing
>> perspective from the TNC WG, and Lee Farrell for contributing his
>> excellent notes to the production of these minutes.
>>>> --
>> Regards,
>> Brian Smithson
>> PM, Security Research
>> PMP, CISSP, CISA, ISO 27000 PA
>> Advanced Imaging and Network Technologies
>> Ricoh Americas Corporation
>> (408)346-4435
>>>>>>>