IPP Mail Archive: Re: IPP> ADM - PWG IPP Phone Conference on 980603, 10:00 AM PDT

IPP Mail Archive: Re: IPP> ADM - PWG IPP Phone Conference on 980603, 10:00 AM PDT

Re: IPP> ADM - PWG IPP Phone Conference on 980603, 10:00 AM PDT

James Walker (walker@dazel.com)
Tue, 02 Jun 1998 08:24:45 -0500

> PWG IPP Phone Conference on 980603, 10:00 AM PDT
> ================================================
>
> By now I hope that everybody has seen the feedback information from Keith
> Moore. In response to that I want to dedicate the next phone conference to
> sort out trivial vs. more complex tasks to resolve the listed issues.
>
> Please read Keith's message beforehand, so we can get straight into the
> discussion. You can obvioiusly express views also beforehand on the DL.

I am curious about process at this point. Does Keith's response
represent the official IETF response to the IPP submissions?
In other words, if we respond to and satisfy all of his objections,
do we have RFC's?

If so, then, Keith, do you consider all comments that were submitted
during the last call in forming your opinion/comments? If not, when
do those comments come under consideration? I do not know how many
submitted comments during last call (presumably there were some, but
they probably went directly to the IESG), but it seems to me that all
negative comments out to be considered by someone.

I have to be honest and admit that I sent my comments directly to
the IESG (without CC:ing the IPP DL), but I guess I had no idea
that all of this would go into such a black hole for such a long
period of time. If there is interest in discussing comments that
were submitted during the last call, I would consider forwarding
my comments to the list.

curious...
...walker

--
Jim Walker <walker@dazel.com>
System Architect/DAZEL Wizard
DAZEL Corporation, Austin, TX