IPP Mail Archive: Re: IPP> Implications of a new scheme, etc

IPP Mail Archive: Re: IPP> Implications of a new scheme, etc

Re: IPP> Implications of a new scheme, etc

Roger K Debry (rdebry@us.ibm.com)
Mon, 8 Jun 1998 08:38:06 -0400

The inclusion of URLs in IPP responses seems to be the subject
of a lot of debate just now. If the outcome of the debate is that the=
y
stay in the response, and include the scheme, then there is some
impact, but I'd judge it pretty small. Would you agree?

Roger K deBry
Senior Technical Staff Member
Architecture and Technology
IBM Printing Systems
email: rdebry@us.ibm.com
phone: 1-303-924-4080

owner-ipp@pwg.org on 06/05/98 03:25:13 PM
Please respond to walker@dazel.com
To: Roger K Debry/Boulder/IBM@ibmus
cc: ipp@pwg.org
Subject: Re: IPP> Implications of a new scheme, etc

Is it true that there is "no impact" on the Servers for the
IPP:X (HTTP on the Wire) scenario? I know that there are URI's
that a server has to return to the client, so I am just wondering
if there is going to be any server problems (because the URI's
will have to be presented as IPP:, right?).

curious...
...walker

--
Jim Walker <walker@dazel.com>
System Architect/DAZEL Wizard
DAZEL Corporation, Austin, TX

=