IPP Mail Archive: IPP> Re: OPS - Need better titles for the

IPP Mail Archive: IPP> Re: OPS - Need better titles for the

IPP> Re: OPS - Need better titles for the Set2 and Set3 documents

From: Ron Bergman (rbergma@hitachi-hkis.com)
Date: Mon Feb 28 2000 - 19:12:43 EST

  • Next message: McDonald, Ira: "RE: IPP> Review of the SNMP Notifications Method"


    Any titles would be better than what we have now.

    If I recall correctly, the title "Set 1" was originally suggested by Paul
    Moore as a way to identify the set without having to generate a
    complex title. Thus the original "Set 1" was just to be "Additional
    Operations, Set 1". I now don't remember what the title evolved
    into before it was integrated into IPP/1.1, but it most likely did

    I agree that more descriptive titles are better, as long as they are
    simple. Either of your suggestions are fine, but I would not
    recommend changing "Set 3" to "Set 1". We have been using
    the "Set" label for so long this would add significant confusion.


    "Hastings, Tom N" wrote:

    > Sounds like a problem we should fix in the titles of Set2 and Set3.
    > However, Carl-Uno and I suggest that we should have some more description in
    > the title too, such as:
    > Internet Printing Protocol: Additional Administrative Operations, Set 2
    > or:
    > Internet Printing Protocol: Additional Job and Printer Operations, Set 2
    > and:
    > Internet Printing Protocol: Device Operations, Set 3
    > (or should the latter be Set 1, since we haven't had any Device operation
    > yet?)
    > For comparison, the current name for the Set operations is:
    > Internet Printing Protocol: Job and Printer Set Operations
    > Carl-Uno suggests we discuss this on the IPP telecon this Wednesday, and on
    > the mailing list.
    > Comments?
    > Tom
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Ron Bergman [mailto:rbergma@hitachi-hkis.com]
    > Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2000 17:43
    > To: Tom Hastings; cmanros@cp10.es.xerox.com
    > Subject: Set2 Operations
    > Tom,
    > This title is becoming extremely confusing. I suggest it be changed to:
    > Internet Printing Protocol: Additional Operations, Set 2
    > And a similar change for set 3.
    > These titles appear to be more descriptive. i.e. they are actually
    > *additional* operations, not *set* operations.
    > Ron Bergman

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Feb 28 2000 - 19:08:00 EST