IPP Mail Archive: Re: IPP> OPS - Need better titles for the

IPP Mail Archive: Re: IPP> OPS - Need better titles for the

Re: IPP> OPS - Need better titles for the Set2 and Set3 documents

From: Ron Bergman (rbergma@hitachi-hkis.com)
Date: Mon Feb 28 2000 - 19:24:15 EST

  • Next message: Ron Bergman: "Re: IPP> Review of the SNMP Notifications Method"

    I like Ira's names except I would like to maintain the current
    "Set" sequence. I propose:

       "New Printer and Job Admin Operations (Set 2)"

    and

       "New Device Admin Operations (Set 3)"

    To be consistant, we should have also used the name:

       "Job and Printer Set Operations (Set 4)"

    But no need to make any retrofits.

        Ron

    "McDonald, Ira" wrote:

    > Hi Tom,
    > Hi Tom,
    >
    > I favor just 'New Printer and Job Admin Operations, Set 2'
    > and 'New Device Admin Operations, Set 1' (and suitably
    > clear filenames for I-Ds).
    >
    > Cheers,
    > - Ira McDonald
    > High North Inc
    >
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Hastings, Tom N [mailto:hastings@cp10.es.xerox.com]
    > Sent: Monday, February 28, 2000 3:28 PM
    > To: Ron Bergman; Tom Hastings; cmanros@cp10.es.xerox.com
    > Cc: ipp
    > Subject: IPP> OPS - Need better titles for the Set2 and Set3 documents
    >
    > Sounds like a problem we should fix in the titles of Set2 and Set3.
    > However, Carl-Uno and I suggest that we should have some more description in
    > the title too, such as:
    >
    > Internet Printing Protocol: Additional Administrative Operations, Set 2
    >
    > or:
    >
    > Internet Printing Protocol: Additional Job and Printer Operations, Set 2
    >
    > and:
    >
    > Internet Printing Protocol: Device Operations, Set 3
    >
    > (or should the latter be Set 1, since we haven't had any Device operation
    > yet?)
    >
    > For comparison, the current name for the Set operations is:
    >
    > Internet Printing Protocol: Job and Printer Set Operations
    >
    > Carl-Uno suggests we discuss this on the IPP telecon this Wednesday, and on
    > the mailing list.
    >
    > Comments?
    >
    > Tom
    >
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Ron Bergman [mailto:rbergma@hitachi-hkis.com]
    > Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2000 17:43
    > To: Tom Hastings; cmanros@cp10.es.xerox.com
    > Subject: Set2 Operations
    >
    > Tom,
    >
    > This title is becoming extremely confusing. I suggest it be changed to:
    >
    > Internet Printing Protocol: Additional Operations, Set 2
    >
    > And a similar change for set 3.
    >
    > These titles appear to be more descriptive. i.e. they are actually
    > *additional* operations, not *set* operations.
    >
    > Ron Bergman



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Feb 28 2000 - 19:20:04 EST