IPP Mail Archive: RE: IPP> Re: Root OID for IPP Printer Sche

IPP Mail Archive: RE: IPP> Re: Root OID for IPP Printer Sche

RE: IPP> Re: Root OID for IPP Printer Schema

From: James Kempf (James.Kempf@Eng.Sun.COM)
Date: Fri Apr 21 2000 - 16:27:01 EDT

  • Next message: Bruce Greenblatt: "RE: IPP> Re: Root OID for IPP Printer Schema"

    I'll talk to IANA about deriving one from 1.3.6.1 for the SLP template
    translation draft, and then you can use that one for the IPP printer
    schema which I think was fashioned according to the draft. That will
    fix the problem for all schema derived according to the template
    translation draft (unless, of course, you prefer to have a unique OID for the
    printer schmea).

    Can anybody send me the email address of the person I need to
    contact at IANA for the OID assignment, and Ian McDonald's email
    address (presuming he's still working on the printer schema) so
    I can talk to him about it?

    Thanx.

                    jak

    >Resent-Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2000 12:43:30 -0700 (PDT)
    >From: harryl@us.ibm.com
    >X-Lotus-FromDomain: IBMUS
    >To: "Alexis Bor" <alexis.bor@directoryworks.com>
    >cc: bgreenblatt@directory-applications.com, cmanros@cp10.es.xerox.com,
    ietf-ldapext@netscape.com, ipp@pwg.org, mark.wahl@innosoft.com
    >Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2000 13:42:19 -0600
    >Subject: RE: IPP> Re: Root OID for IPP Printer Schema
    >Mime-Version: 1.0
    >Content-Disposition: inline
    >Resent-Message-ID: <"e-9vgC.A.IdE.Q9KA5"@glacier>
    >Resent-From: ietf-ldapext@netscape.com
    >X-Mailing-List: <ietf-ldapext@netscape.com>
    >X-Loop: ietf-ldapext@netscape.com
    >Resent-Sender: ietf-ldapext-request@netscape.com
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >Personally, I don't care about "politically" correct, I'm simply trying to
    >be correct.
    >
    >I think a standards track RFC will carry the IETF copyright meaning the
    >IETF is ultimately responsible for "change control" and would (presumably)
    >desire not to have OIDs managed and maintained by a private enterprise.
    >
    >Granted, there's not a lot of dynamics available that could inadvertently
    >"hose" an assigned OID subtree... no matter where it lies.
    >
    >Harry Lewis
    >IBM Printing Systems
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >"Alexis Bor" <alexis.bor@directoryworks.com>
    >Sent by: owner-ipp@pwg.org
    >04/21/00 01:02 PM
    >
    >
    > To: "Manros, Carl-Uno B" <cmanros@cp10.es.xerox.com>, "Bruce
    >Greenblatt"
    ><bgreenblatt@directory-applications.com>, Harry Lewis/Boulder/IBM@IBMUS,
    ><mark.wahl@innosoft.com>, <ietf-ldapext@netscape.com>
    > cc: <ipp@pwg.org>
    > Subject: RE: IPP> Re: Root OID for IPP Printer Schema
    >
    >
    >All we are doing is making IETF more politically correct, and thus making
    >politics slow down the technical process... Are we going to go through
    >several version of the draft arguing over this???
    >
    >Let's just choose one and move on... It will not impact the sales of
    >any
    >products nor the operation of any protocol...
    >
    >-- Alexis
    >
    >Alexis Bor
    >Directory Works, Inc.
    >alexis.bor@directoryworks.com
    >http://www.directoryworks.com
    >
    >-----Original Message-----
    >From: Manros, Carl-Uno B [mailto:cmanros@cp10.es.xerox.com]
    >Sent: Friday, April 21, 2000 11:33 AM
    >To: Bruce Greenblatt; harryl@us.ibm.com; mark.wahl@innosoft.com;
    >ietf-ldapext@netscape.com
    >Cc: ipp@pwg.org
    >Subject: RE: IPP> Re: Root OID for IPP Printer Schema
    >
    >Bruce,
    >
    >It is politically incorrect. We had objections raised in IET47 on this.
    >
    >Carl-Uno Manros
    >IETF IPP Chair
    >
    >
    >-----Original Message-----
    >From: Bruce Greenblatt [mailto:bgreenblatt@directory-applications.com]
    >Sent: Friday, April 21, 2000 11:26 AM
    >To: harryl@us.ibm.com; mark.wahl@innosoft.com; ietf-ldapext@netscape.com
    >Cc: ipp@pwg.org
    >Subject: IPP> Re: Root OID for IPP Printer Schema
    >
    >
    >What's wrong with continuing to use the one from Sun? As long as it is
    >unambiguous, who cares?
    >
    >Bruce
    >
    >At 11:59 AM 4/21/2000 -0600, harryl@us.ibm.com wrote:
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>The Internet Printing Protocol Working Group is developing an Internet
    >>Draft describing an LDAP Schema for Printer Services.
    >>
    >>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ipp-ldap-printer-schema-00.t
    >
    >xt
    >>
    >>
    >>For expediency, the initial draft specifies OIDs from a Sun Microsystems
    >>private enterprise subtree. In preparation for a standards track document
    >>we would like these OIDs to be routed in a standards subtree. We want to
    >>harmonize with any convention that may exist within the LDAP community
    >for
    >>registering this subtree. Will the LDAP group make the request for an
    >>assigned OID subtree or would you prefer for the IPP group to make the
    >>request?
    >>
    >>Harry Lewis
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >==============================================
    >Bruce Greenblatt, Ph. D.
    >Directory Tools and Application Services, Inc.
    >http://www.directory-applications.com
    >Sign up for our LDAP Technical Overview Seminar at:
    >http://www.acteva.com/go/dtasi
    >
    >
    >
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Apr 21 2000 - 16:33:21 EDT