IPP Mail Archive: RE: IPP>NOT mailto feature from IETF meeti

RE: IPP>NOT mailto feature from IETF meeting (RE: IPP> ADM - The IPPNotification I-Ds will now go the IESG)]

From: Herriot, Robert (Robert.Herriot@pahv.xerox.com)
Date: Tue Aug 22 2000 - 16:47:37 EDT

Next message: Carl Kugler/Boulder/IBM: "RE: IPP> machine readable etc. - why Harry is right"

Previous message: pmoore@peerless.com: "RE: IPP> machine readable etc. - why Harry is right"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: McDonald, Ira [mailto:imcdonald@sharplabs.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2000 1:24 PM
> To meet your (and other PWG members) desires, simply
> delete all language about the content OR change it
> be SHOULD (RECOMMENDED) and punt on testing.

The language in the spec has said "SHOULD" all along.

We have tried to recommend content in a general way and leave the specific
phrasing to the vendor. For example, we recommend that a printer name be
present, but let the vendor choose the words.

Next message: Carl Kugler/Boulder/IBM: "RE: IPP> machine readable etc. - why Harry is right"
Previous message: pmoore@peerless.com: "RE: IPP> machine readable etc. - why Harry is right"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Aug 22 2000 - 17:08:39 EDT