IPP Mail Archive: IPP> NOT - Last word for now on Notificati

IPP> NOT - Last word for now on Notification delivery methods

From: Manros, Carl-Uno B (cmanros@cp10.es.xerox.com)
Date: Wed Aug 30 2000 - 17:10:43 EDT

  • Next message: Manros, Carl-Uno B: "RE: IPP> New PROPOSED STANDARD document for publishing as RFC - I nternet Printing Protocol (IPP): LDAP Schema for Printer Services <draft- ietf-ipp- ldap-printer-schema-03.txt>"

    All,

    During today's IPP phone conference we went over the current state of the 4
    notification drafts one more time.

    Here is the outcome of that discussion. If you disapprove, please speak up
    right away, otherwise this is the action plan for the IPP WG I will execute
    on within a week:

    1) mailto: Not enough support for the addition of machine readable
    notification. We will hence return to the text that was in the IPP WG Last
    Call and send it to the IESG for approval as Proposed Standard RFC.

    2) indp: No conflict, we will send the draft to the IESG for approval as
    Proposed Standard RFC.

    3) snmp: Several people have questioned whether there is enough support to
    progress this as an IPP WG document. Will be put on ice, and might just die.

    4) ippget: Although the current text seems OK, we have had suggestions that
    it should be enhanced for anybody to be interested enough to implement it.
    Will be put on ice, and either we get further proposals, and agreements on
    how to fix it, or it might just die.

    This will focus implementers' attention on the two main delivery methods
    that we actually seem to have agreements about, and leave the other two at
    the roadside for the time being, maybe forever. For individual contributors
    to the "dropped" methods, there is always the option to bring the drafts in
    to the IESG as personal drafts for progression as "Informational" or
    possibly 'Experimental'. This would only make sense if there was an
    implementation behind it.

    The other three notification documents that have already been out for IPP WG
    Last Call, I also deem to be ready to send to the IESG, after a few
    editorial corrections that we spotted during the Last Call period.

    It's about time for the IPP WG to get some notification documents out the
    door and published as RFCs, we have dragged our feet on this too long
    already.

    Carl-Uno

    Carl-Uno Manros
    Principal Engineer - Xerox Architecture Center - Xerox Corporation
    701 S. Aviation Blvd., El Segundo, CA, M/S: ESAE-231
    Phone +1-310-333 8273, Fax +1-310-333 5514
    Email: manros@cp10.es.xerox.com



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Aug 30 2000 - 17:19:43 EDT