I'm questioning the use of 1/1000 for English but only 1/10 for metric.
Not only are we loosing precision, but, also introducing rounding errors
during conversion from English to metric . I know the printer MIB heritage is 1/1000 English and 1/10 metric... but
I think we should try to be more precise in this new media mapping.
----------------------------------------------
Harry Lewis
IBM Printing Systems
----------------------------------------------
RonBergman@aol.com
Sent by: owner-ipp@pwg.org
04/09/2001 02:26 PM
To: <ipp@pwg.org>, <upd@pwg.org>
cc:
Subject: IPP> Fwd: FW: Media Standardized Names, Version D0.6 is now available
----- Message from "Bergman, Ron" <Ron.Bergman@Hitachi-hkis.com> on Mon, 9
Apr 2001 08:02:14 -0700 -----
To:
"'RonBergman@aol.com'" <RonBergman@aol.com>
Subject:
FW: Media Standardized Names, Version D0.6 is now available
-----Original Message-----
From: Bergman, Ron [mailto:Ron.Bergman@HITACHI-HKIS.COM]
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2001 8:01 AM
To: IMAGING@FORUM.UPNP.ORG
Subject: Media Standardized Names, Version D0.6 is now available
All,
The latest draft is now available at:
ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/media-sizes/pwg-media-06.pdf (or .doc)
I will not repeat the abstract here or the list of changes. This
information is
available within the document, if you are interested. The major change to
this
version is the addition of the "Media Finish Names".
This document will have a final review in the PWG meetings during the week
of April 23rd and should then be ready for last call.
Ron Bergman
Hitachi Koki Imaging Solutions
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Apr 16 2001 - 18:34:32 EDT