IPP Mail Archive: RE: IPP> Latest version of application/vnd

IPP Mail Archive: RE: IPP> Latest version of application/vnd

RE: IPP> Latest version of application/vnd.pwg-multiplexed

From: McDonald, Ira (imcdonald@sharplabs.com)
Date: Thu Mar 21 2002 - 12:59:38 EST

  • Next message: Carl: "IPP> Short Notes from IETF 53"

    Hi Melinda,

    Thanks for reviewing application/vnd.pwg-multiplexed. Could
    you possibly break out your substantive comments and send them
    in a _plaintext_ mail note to the IPP list, please?

    [Note that ipp@pwg.org is an IETF mailing list, so rich text
    mail notes are not suitable, by IETF process rules].

    Please note that application/vnd.pwg-multiplexed is now in
    the IESG Status queue (near the top for Informational RFCs),
    with the action token to our IETF Applications Area Director,
    Ned Freed.

    This document is also in the RFC Editor's Queue (near the
    top for Informational RFCs, by date received).

    All of which means that it may enter IETF 'last call' very
    soon, so any substantive changes need to be discussed on
    the IPP list (and elsewhere, of course) ASAP.

    - Ira McDonald
      High North Inc

    -----Original Message-----
    From: GRANT,MELINDA (HP-Vancouver,ex1) [mailto:melinda_grant@hp.com]
    Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 11:00 PM
    To: Robert Herriot; ipp@pwg.org; ifx@pwg.org; xp@pwg.org; UPnP Img WG
    Subject: RE: IPP> Latest version of application/vnd.pwg-multiplexed

    Hi Robert,

    Attached is a marked-up version of your document. The mark-up contains
    suggested changes, and questions or food for thought in the form of
    comments. Many are trivial: simple typos, grammar, spelling and such. Many
    are suggested wording changes that probably represent personal preference as
    much as anything else; if it doesn't seem like an improvement to you, just
    throw it in the bit-bucket. ;-)

    There are a couple of substantive changes suggested, and if you disagree
    with or have questions about those, they would probably merit some

    We have some other comments that we will propose for the XHTML-Print
    appendix dealing with the application/vnd.pwg-multiplexed content-type, as
    they are specific to situations where the root message of content type


    Melinda Grant
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Robert Herriot [mailto:bob@herriot.com]
    Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 2:35 PM
    To: ipp@pwg.org; ifx@pwg.org
    Subject: IPP> Latest version of application/vnd.pwg-multiplexed

    The latest version of application/vnd.pwg-multiplexed (nee
    application/multiplexed) is now available at:


    This version makes many clarifications and changes its name. However, this
    version doesn't change the representation.

    I have requested that the rfc-editor publish it as an informational RFC.

    Bob Herriot

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 21 2002 - 13:00:11 EST