Hi Juergen,
This is a tough question. For six years now every Xerox product has
shipped with 'prtAlertIndex' at 'read-only' to preserve the content
of the notification. I have seen this done at several other printer
vendors. To date, there is no identified shipping implementation
that leaves 'prtAlertIndex' at 'not-accessible' (that was only one
of several compile errors in the RFC 1759 text - I've never seen a
compiler that would accept RFC 1759 unmodified, but I suppose it's
possible).
Our WG concensus to change the published version to 'read-only' is
in order to align with all known shipping implementations (who all
did it by hand-edit themselves).
Cheers,
- Ira McDonald, consulting architect at Xerox
High North
-----Original Message-----
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder [mailto:schoenw@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 2:23 AM
To: Ron.Bergman@Hitachi-hkis.com
Cc: dbh@enterasys.com; bwijnen@lucent.com; Ron.Bergman@Hitachi-hkis.com;
harryl@us.ibm.com; rcasterline@crt.xerox.com; pmp@pwg.org;
paf@cisco.com; ned.freed@mrochek.com; IMcDonald@crt.xerox.com
Subject: Re: Print MIB 09
>>>>> Bergman, Ron writes:
Ron> The WG has already discussed the addition of text to explain why
Ron> prtAlertIndex is broken. In fact is is presently being drafted.
Ron> We are still not sure if this object must be "not-accessible" or
Ron> can we change to "read-only". Since with many compilers the MIB
Ron> must be modified to "read-only", the WG prefers to change the
Ron> MAX-ACCESS clause. The addition of a new group and conformance
Ron> statements, in this case, is agreed.
There are existing fielded implementations that implement
prtAlertIndex not-accessible. So what is the point in making it
read-only just to kind of fix the notification? If it is true that
people had problems to implement the notification because
prtAlertIndex is not-accessible, then this would be a data point to
actually fix the notification by providing a new one that does it
right.
Changing prtAlertIndex from not-accessible to read-only to fix the
notification kind is IMHO heading in the wrong direction.
/js
-- Juergen Schoenwaelder Technical University Braunschweig <schoenw@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de> Dept. Operating Systems & Computer Networks Phone: +49 531 391 3289 Muehlenpfordtstr. 23, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany Fax: +49 531 391 5936 <http://www.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de/~schoenw/>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 14 2001 - 11:43:56 EST