IPP>PRO future face-to-face meeting

IPP>PRO future face-to-face meeting

IPP>PRO future face-to-face meeting

Tom Hastings hastings at cp10.es.xerox.com
Wed May 21 10:35:44 EDT 1997


I strongly agree with Roger on having a straw proposal to work from.


Bob and Randy,
Can you two produce such a straw proposal with issues listed?


Thanks,
Tom




At 06:55 05/21/97 PDT, Roger K Debry wrote:
>I would be interested in such a meeting, but would strongly
>suggest that we all have a straw proposal to work from.   I
>find meeting much more productive if we have a documented
>proposal to work from and a specific set of issues to work on.
>
>At this point I have no preference for dates.
>
>Roger K deBry
>Senior Techncial Staff Member
>Architecture and Technology
>IBM Printing Systems
>email: rdebry at us.ibm.com
>phone: 1-303-924-4080
>
>
>---------------------- Forwarded by Roger K Debry/Boulder/IBM on 05/21/97 07:45
>AM ---------------------------
>
>        BLDVMA.GEBERT @ D03AU003
>        05/20/97 06:04 PM
>Please respond to BLDVMA.GEBERT @ VM
>
>
>To: Roger K Debry/Boulder/IBM, Roger K Debry/Boulder/IBM
>cc:
>Subject: IPP>PRO future face-to-face meeting
>
>***********************************************************
>SECURITY CLASSIFICATION:
>     I could not believe this note. Those guys must have absolutely
>     nothing to do and absolutely no regard for other people's time
>     if they want to schedule a meeting between already very frequent
>     meetings. From my experience with their conf calls, they should
>     try to find a higher degree of focus, rather than calling more
>     meetings. I am very appreciative of the fact that you have
>     more patience with this cooperative process. I would not be
>     able to sit through 10 minutes of their meetings!
>
>     Hopefully they will at a minimum have a conf room with a phone
>     able to tie in other people who will only want to hear a small
>     fraction of the uninteresting discussions and get the few
>     useful pieces. Steve.
>
>*** Forwarding note from SMTP3   --IINUS1   05/20/97 17:47 ***
>=========================================================================
>Received: from lists.underscore.com by vnet.IBM.COM (IBM VM SMTP V2R3) with
>TCP;
>   Tue, 20 May 97 19:47:29 EDT
>Received: from localhost (daemon at localhost) by lists.underscore.com
>(8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id TAA25541; Tue, 20 May 1997 19:46:55 -0400 (EDT)
>Received: by pwg.org (bulk_mailer v1.5); Tue, 20 May 1997 19:45:57 -0400
>Received: (from daemon at localhost) by lists.underscore.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id
>TAA25399 for ipp-outgoing; Tue, 20 May 1997 19:42:09 -0400 (EDT)
>Date: Tue, 20 May 1997 16:44:05 -0700
>From: Robert.Herriot at Eng.Sun.COM (Robert Herriot)
>Message-Id: <199705202344.QAA02587 at woden.eng.sun.com>
>To: ipp at pwg.org
>Subject: IPP>PRO future face-to-face meeting
>X-Sun-Charset: US-ASCII
>Sender: ipp-owner at pwg.org
>
>
>Randy and I talked about having a face-to-face meeting in June before the
>Boston meeting in order to work out details of the protocol. We
>believe that we need to wrap up most loose ends by the June meeting
>in Boston.
>
>The location would likely be in the San Francisco Bay area, possibly
>at Sun, and the likely meeting dates would be Tuesday June 10 or
>Wednesday June 11.
>
>If you are interested in attending such a meeting, please let me
>know whether such dates would work for you and indicate your preference
>for June 10 or 11.
>
>Bob Herriot
>
>
>
>
>



More information about the Ipp mailing list