[MFD] Apple has reviewed the MFD Model and Common Semantics and has comments

[MFD] Apple has reviewed the MFD Model and Common Semantics and has comments

[MFD] Apple has reviewed the MFD Model and Common Semantics and has comments

Michael Sweet msweet at apple.com
Tue Feb 22 06:05:48 UTC 2011


Comments:

Lines 913-915: ArtBox section indented too much

Lines 617, 1149, 1212, 1280, 1759, 1829, 1835, 2423: Bad references?

Tables 21, 28: Bad references?

Sections 7.3.1.14, 7.3.1.15: I am not sure the suggestion to drop Hold/Release<service>Job is appropriate here, as we don't define required operations for any services. Better to just note the deprecation and then not require them in the individual service documents as appropriate.

__________________________________________________
Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/mfd/attachments/20110221/463f657c/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the mfd mailing list